Choppy, jerky, with jumping frames.įirstly, are you producing to the same specification (resolution, frame rate etc) as your original material. Quote I've been using Hitfilm for edits, but now I checked Cyberlink's Power Director 16 trial version and I liked its functionality - effects, shortcuts, quickness - so I wanted to buy it, but then I started exporting the projects, using H264, HD, 30 FPS - from the trial version to see the quality. Has anyone run into this? Is there a fix? Or is it done on purpose in the trial version? There is maybe 10-25% difference, but the output clips are still much worse than the ones made in Hitfilm. Then I saw this about turning off deblocking: I tried this on two different computers, with different hardware (both Nvidia cards, but different types), and the output files from Power Director were always choppy and jerky. It looked better, but with Hitfilm, I exported videos 29.97 FPS and they were perfect at half the filesize and no choppiness at all. The clips look great in the timeline edit, the preview is OK - but the output files are just bad-looking, like a laggy transmission. X265 isn't supported in the trial version, but I tried exporting as XAVC - and it was the same. I tried NTSC, PAL, different resolutions (HD or 720) - it was still choppy and jerky. I've been using Hitfilm for edits, but now I checked Cyberlink's Power Director 16 trial version and I liked its functionality - effects, shortcuts, quickness - so I wanted to buy it, but then I started exporting the projects, using H264, HD, 30 FPS - from the trial version to see the quality.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |